Dear Ella is a good book. It is meant to be. Dear Ella would have been a better book if it wasn’t self-published. If Dear Ella doesn’t do well as a book, I’ll hold self-publishing by the collar and spit my disgust into its face. Think editorial issues and the book’s little or no publicity situation for instance and you will get what I am saying. Let’s note that there are books published traditionally with editorial flaws. And I have read and reviewed a couple of them.  Why did I make the last sentence? I don’t want anyone thinking someone hates the idea of self-publishing. No, I don’t. By the way, some good books, really good ones out there were self-published. Let’s get straight to the heart of the matter: Dear Ella would have been a better book if it wasn’t self-published. I know a few self-published authors. I know of a fewer population, from that group, that is successful. The books of these successful self-published authors, for instance, may encourage one to deep one’s feet into the uncertain deep that self-publishing may be, that it is. The implications of doing that could be more than one can bear. Again, if Dear Ella doesn’t do well as a book, I’ll hold self-publishing by the collar and spit my disgust into its face. Wait, who is this self-publisher? Bomi, Bomi Ehimony. I may have to mail Bomi after this review and I’ll blame him for not writing more drafts. For not being patient enough before publishing Dear Ella. For making his prose sound childish sometimes.  Why am I even saying all that? I saw beyond Dear Ella and you know what?  Bomi is a good writer. 



Let’s talk about Bomi. Bomi is a good writer. Google his name and let’s see what you’ll come up with. Then, we can talk about his writings in the comments section.


Dear Ella. The book tells a tale that revolves around love, class distinction, betrayal of trust and politics all merged together, Nollywood style. The beauty in this thematic plurality is in how they are all sewn together to present the workings of causality, karma. Hence, Dear Ella gets you anticipating the next move; and the story is gifted with enough twists and turns. That is why I hold unto my position that Bomi is a good storyteller. Let’s eschew the features of the book that don’t fit well this once, Bomi gets you on the edge of your seat, your toes curled up like a crab’s legs as you expect the next jolt.

Dear Ella is about three families. Two of the families - the Peter and Orgu families - are on the opposite sides of the social class divide. The third family, a doctor’s, is squashed in between them. The doctor accepts to betray his Hippocratic Oath by switching babies, the rich family’s for the poor’s.  This is on account of a medical condition, Cystic Fibrosis, the Orgu baby has and which his parents consider difficult to come to terms with. Not doing that may signify kissing his kidnapped wife goodbye. The result rubs off on both families. I think the poor family - the Peters - suffers more though. The impact of the disproportionate allocation of judgement makes karma seem restrained. Or why should Mr Peter lose his wife and Dominion in the course of the story? Moreover, from the perspective of the Orgu family, we see how ruinous issues of domestic significance can be when they spill into the public space. 


I dislike it when my best characters die. Dominion had little space to manifest in the story. Death, not Bomi is guilty. I like that Dominion loves books. Ella too. Bomi’s bringing of both of them together is a brilliant idea. Here is a conversation between the two that I like:


“You are reading The Perks of Being a Wallflower. It’s an unfortunate book.”

“’Unfortunate’” Ella repeated then smiled. “Have you read it?”

“Spoiler alert – Aunt Helen sexually abused Charlie when he was little.” Dominion said.

“I already know what happened. I have read it before.” Ella said.

“Then why are you reading it again?” He laughed.

“Because… well, because I like it.” She said.

“Why? It’s a sad book.”

“It’s really not that sad. It’s just depressing.”

“I don’t know what that means. What’s the difference?” Dominion laughed.

“Sad makes you cry, depressing makes you feel down.” Ella said.

“In that case, there are no sad books because no book is actually capable of making a person cry.” Dominion said.

“Oh there are lots of sad books.”

“Like,”

“Have you read Looking for Alaska?”

Dominion laughed and shook his head no.

“You should. It will make you cry.” (294-296)
 

Aside the fact that bringing Ella and Dominion together helped fan the embers of their individual characters, it helped Bomi hurry the plot. Hence, it’s a fast read. Dear Ella isn’t bulky too. Dear Ella is narrated by a guardian angel, the one assigned to Ella. He is ready to, against all odds, go all out to save Ella; nothing goes all out to save Bomi’s prose from a reviewer’s ‘cruelty’. It’s painful, I mean it. I hope there is a revised copy of Dear Ella soon enough.



I

Writing is an art, a jealous one at that. You have it in you and you're doomed for a lifetime of unease. You (must) appease your writing sense constantly with oblations that necessitate that you eat up leaves, spill ink on paper as well as imagine the imaginable and the unimaginable, its twin. That you have to read and write, by the way is not the big deal. You already know you have to do both. 

That writing is a jealous art is the big deal! That it wants a whole 24 hours to itself. You're on the toilet seat and all you can think about is what a character's response would be to the rape of her son, by the father. You're on the roadside and you are burdened by the fact that your 7 - 7 job has denied you from scribbling something, poignant or otherwise in a long time. You realise that the moment you heed the call to be a writer, your consciousness becomes the art's monitoring mechanism, whipping words and characters and lots of times, waste-bin-worthy stuff out of your experiences and imagination. It, this consciousness - when the space and time (as writing desires) to whip out your phone and type away or to write that poem in your pad doesn’t come - treats you like you're shit and sanity is far from you. So far, as Timbuktu. Or even that your sanity is somewhere in Timbuktu, roaming the streets in search of free sex...



II

I think a break from writing is harmful to the writer. It, that break, makes him feel like there is no essence for which he lives. It makes him seem insane at other times. And that is often my predicament. I feel incomplete and on account of this wish I can squelch life out of the bitch of the good thing that writing is. 

I want to write. Yes, I do, but I won't on a hungry belly. And that is the cause of the break most times. I take the liberty to reverse the scripture here: man must not live by words alone. 

It’s about food. Daily bread.



III

I won't feed on letters and images, beautiful sentences and all. True. But then, what is the essence of a life of enough (and the quest for more) when the mind is not at rest; when the consciousness that you write will cordon peace off your mind? 



IV

I desire to keep these two parts of me: I want to live, as comfortable as I can afford, yet I want to be free from the torment of the writer's consciousness. Hence, I'll keep working for my daily bread while writing the little I can, per day. And wherever. A sentence per day isn't too little. No?

 


 
 

About this blog

Of literature 'n' living. Me too. *winks*

Popular Posts

Follow me on Twitter

See What I'm Reading

See What I'm Reading

Featured Post

Between Death and 'I'

For Mummy EOO I His grandfather. It dawned on him that he wouldn’t want to be like the old man, as rich as he was. The name ...

Oyebanji Ayodele. Powered by Blogger.